Monday, March 10, 2014

The Female Psychosis part 2: Narcissism



There is a difference between Narcissism and Egocentrism. Egocentrism is a cognitive error while Narcissism is an emotional one. It is crucial that we recognize this distinction because both of them are similar but at the same time Narcissism is more complex because it is the natural progression of Egocentrism. We have learned from part one of this series that Egocentrism can manifests in adolescence in 3 ways; Imaginary Audience, Personal Fable and Apparent Hypocrisy. When a teenager feels that everyone is constantly observing and judging her (Imaginary Audience), and then believes that she is special because she thinks everyone is interested in her (Personal Fable) then she believes that she is indeed special and should be given preferential treatment (Apparent Hypocrisy). Using this example, we can see how adolescent egocentrism would evolve into Narcissism which can then be termed as self-aggrandizement.

I Want It All (And I Want It Now)
The core of the Narcissistic drive is the emotion of shame. Unlike guilt, shame is the most unbearable emotion to narcissists because it is pervasive personal flaw and not a misdeed. It is so unbearable to them that they create means to not experience it at all and in the process they are hypersensitive to shame; if they ever experience even the slightest humiliation they will go into a disproportional frenzied reaction. Narcissism develops from being unable to confront and cope with shame constructively (Nathanson 1987). To the Narcissist, it is never their fault because admitting fault means being ashamed and they cannot handle it.

To avoid feeling defective and insignificant, the narcissist develops seven traits that are common among them which are Shamelessness, Magical Thinking, Entitlement, Envy, Arrogance, Bad Boundaries and Exploitation (Hotchkiss 2003: 3-27). Shamelessness is a typical trait and manifests as being unconscientious, amoral, in self-denial, constant blaming and furious outbursts. They appear cold but they have no self-control and erupt by the smallest of affronts. Below is an example in Malaysia where two girls went berserk just because they could not get the beer they wanted. 


FunnyMalaysia.net (2013)

Magical Thinking is a way for the narcissist to distort reality and create the fantasy of grandiosity and omnipotence either within themselves or within others they control. Margot Medhurt founder of Yours Sincerely with 30 years’ experience in the dating industry noted the rise of women with a wide discrepancy between how they perceive themselves and how others see them (Taylor 2009). She stated that these women were often very plain but see themselves as fabulous and exceptional people. She commented that “these women, however, are unable to get their heads around the fact that the rest of the world might not share their distorted, inflated view they have of themselves.”  Magical Thinking also manifests whereby the narcissists transfer the shameful feelings of themselves to others in what is termed as ‘projection’ or shame-dumping. Indeed, slut-shaming which is a primarily a girl-on-girl behavior is the projection of ones own shameful feelings of inadequacies.

Because they view themselves as special, Narcissists also have an unreasonable sense of Entitlement, believing they are always deserving of preferential treatment and automatic compliance. Noncompliance and defiance is seen as a threat on the narcissists’ perceived authority and is met with anger at the person who is viewed as being difficult and awkward. Medhurt elaborated about her clients, “they invariably reject every guy’s profile but if a guy rejects their profile, there is all hell to pay,” and then went on further to say, “they often become indignant and angry towards me, demanding to know why a guy dared to turn them down.” Below is a good commentary on the delusion of self-entitlement.


The Critical G (hey, it’s a good video.)

For those who did not notice, I clue you in to the 3 narcissistic traits of Shamelessness, Magical Thinking and Entitlement as the progression of Imaginary Audience (Magical Thinking), Personal Fable (Entitlement) and Apparent Hypocrisy (Shamelessness).

Imaginary Audience              à                 Magical Thinking
(Everyone is looking at me)       à (Of course they’d look at me!)

Personal Fable    à             Entitlement
(I’m special)           à         (I’m Worth It!)

Apparent Hypocrisy       à                   Shamelessness
(I’m a winner so I don’t need to try) à (I’m a winner so I do whatever I want)

We can see the transference from mental to emotional, how egocentrism evolves into narcissism. It is worth point out that the person does not lose her egocentrism even though it has mutated; she still retains her it because it is a cognitive feature whilst narcissism is an emotional feature. Hence a person can be both egocentric and narcissistic at the same time and they usually are.

Moving on, the next narcissistic trait is Envy which I could write an entire article altogether, but I won’t. Envy is an emotion transformation experienced when the self-worth is compared against another and arriving at a conclusion motivated by the effects of shame (Lamia 2013). To put it another way, you’re not ‘all that’ compare to that person and it makes you feel insecure and worthless. Unlike jealousy, envy is directed towards others; either wanting their attributes, success and possessions, or wanting the other person to lose it all – ‘if I don’t have it, you can’t either’. This explains why women always claim the victim of supposed male privileges because they want the wealth and influence that powerful figures have.

Next, Arrogance is the belief that the narcissist is always better than others or she is worthless. If she is feeling deflated, she will vitiate, denigrate and discredit others to inflate herself again. This is the reason narcissists are domineering, judgmental and despotic, which is to secure their status that will guard them from their dysfunctions and shame. Narcissist will only compete when the outcome is favorable, they fight in fields where they can shine without risk or effort and in areas where they are less skilled they resort to petty one-upmanship to sustain a sense of superiority. This could explain why women shy away from competition especially in the workplace and resort to gender discrimination when they get passed over for promotion.

Narcissists are also bad at with Boundaries, in the sense that they do not recognize personal space and often intrude upon them. Anita Sarkeesian’s war against the male spaces of Gaming Industry is a good example of this. To the narcissist, you exist for them or you don’t at all. Now Shamelessness, Entitlement and Magical Thinking are traits that the narcissist feels about herself. Arrogance, Envy and Boundaries are traits that the narcissist feel and project onto others. Here is how it looks;

Imaginary Audience -- Everyone is looking at me
|
Magical Thinking -- Of course they’re looking at me!
|
Envy -- They shouldn’t be looking at her! She’s such a slut!

Personal Fable -- I’m special
|
Entitlement -- I’m Worth It!
|
Arrogance -- How dare you reject me!

Apparent Hypocrisy -- I’m a winner so I don’t have to try
|
ShamelessnessI’m a winner so I do whatever I want
|
Bad Boundaries -- I can do whatever, to whomever I want

So in essence, Narcissists believes that everything is ‘Mine.’

Here is a video of a narcissistic girlfriend from Malaysia. Please ignore the emasculated boyfriend; he is after all a Blue pill beta male. Note that the girl exhibits Arrogance by speaking down to the boyfriend as if she’s superior, her envy of others with money by bringing-up her boyfriend’s financial inadequacies as well as her Bad Boundaries by having this argument in public without shame.


Jazz Wei (2014)

The culmination of all of this intricate details is the last and most dangerous of all Narcissistic traits; Exploitation which is the manipulation and utilization of others without concern for their interests or wellbeing. This is it folks, the coup de grace of Narcissism;

Imaginary Audience -- Everyone is looking at me
|
Magical Thinking -- Of course they’re looking at me!
|
Envy -- They shouldn’t be looking at her! She’s such a slut!
|
Exploit -- Slut-Shaming and“I’ll fuck her boyfriend!”

Personal Fable -- I’m special
|
Entitlement -- I’m Worth It!
|
Arrogance -- How dare you reject me!
|
Exploit -- I’ll fuck random men then cry rape in the morning.

 Apparent Hypocrisy -- I’m a winner so I don’t have to try
|
ShamelessnessI’m a winner so I do whatever I want
|
Bad Boundaries -- I can do whatever, to whomever I want
|
Exploit I’ll marry you, have your kids then divorce you for alimony

Booyah.

And we know women frequently do this because we always hear stories like how “I slept with my friend’s husband” (Hensley 2014). In this day and age of consent, no woman can blame the man for seducing her unless she wanted him to. It is simply women on a power-trip to prove that she can steal another woman’s lover. We can also observe the number of false-rape accusations; Rumney puts the number of false-rape accusations at 10-50% (Frost 2013) while Kanin estimated it at 40% (1994: 81). And of course the most damning statistics of all and the nail in coffin as it were, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  (2013) found that divorce rate in the United States is 50% in 2011 and we know that women initiated divorce 68.9% for all cases (Saad 2013). The common denominator in all three instances above is women, not men.

You’re So Vain
But how do we know that women have always been this Narcissistic? Consider the history of the Women’s Suffragette Movement of 1906. In England, voting rights were historically linked to land ownership established by King Henry VI in 1432; you could only vote if you owned enough property. In the late 19th century to early 20th century, women were only concern about the women’s rights to vote, citing that it is discrimination against women. But before the voting reform 1918, only 4 out of 10 men could vote and after the Equal Franchise Act of 1928 equal rights to vote was established. Voting rights were never about gender discrimination; it was about class discrimination.

The suffragettes had made it all about women at a time when even men could not vote (manwomanmyth, 2010). These shameless, entitled and self-deluded women could only see their own wants, envied only those that had it and exploited men by claiming male privileges to get it. And this was also during the time of the First World War where men who could not vote were sent to die by the hundreds of thousands. If suffragettes were really concerned with equal rights, why did they not fight for the rights to vote for these men? Instead, feminists such as Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel shamed men into going to war by giving them ‘white feathers’ (Donald, 1998). Feminists did not want equal voting rights for all men and women; feminists wanted voting rights for only women and for the men to just die.

Feminism causes Narcissism.

As Karen Straughan (2013) would say, “the idea of male privilege is so fucking bogus. Privileges are entitlements; what men have had through history wasn’t entitlements because it was a necessary element of performing their obligations. A tool handed to them because it was needed by men in order to fulfill their legally, economically and socially forced obligation to women and children; Not Because Penis!” If men were going to die for their country, then they should have at least the right to vote in their country because along with duty comes the rights to facilitate that duty. The British Women’s Suffragettes do not have obligations or duties to anyone; all they have done for England is being baby factories in the comfort of their husbands who provided and died for them. To think that women were oppressed only highlights their apparent grandiose narcissistic fantasy.  

Love Me Tender
Right about now, the women will be screaming “but men are narcissist too.” Yes, obviously any gender can be narcissistic and there are degrees to how narcissistic a person can be. What I’m pointing out is the prevalence of female narcissism which is even more endemic due to one reason; Narcissistic Supply which is the narcissistic need for attention whether it be celebrity or notoriety (Vaknin n.d.). It explains why women are cam whores, loves to gossip and wanting to reveal and publicize their promiscuity. We can see numerous examples of this on Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. It is also the reason women have friend-zones with friends who functions as emotional tampons. These people serve as mere appliances that exist for the gratification of the narcissists (Kreger 2011). In fact, women have a vast abundance of Narcissistic Supply not only from men, but also their sisterhood where they supply each other that craving for attention.

Men do not have a large pool of Narcissistic Supply and we need to work to get attention. Men compete for recognition and we often shoot down other men whether we realize it or not. And when we do come across narcissistic men; whether it is our employer, father, brother, politician, religious figures, celebrities or whatnot; we often criticize them, fight them and defy those in positions of power. Men do not simply give other men flagrant attention. We reward other men when they are deserving of it; that is the nature of competition and women do not understand this because they constantly get the Pussy Pass on their dysfunctions such as their inherent narcissism.

Hence, we can say with good conscience that there are not many men who can be narcissists but there are sure a lot of women who are.  

Okay, now I have to address the issue of self-love and healthy narcissism. There are psychiatrists and psychologists who believe that moderate narcissism is healthy (Whitbourne 2012). They state that narcissism could be positive and that people with a healthy narcissism lead a healthier lifestyle. This is the kind of quote-mining that you find in women’s magazine articles that perpetuates a woman’s unreasonable sense of entitlement. Why? Because women would only read the headline and say to themselves “Oh, it’s okay to be narcissistic!” Completely taking things out of context and seeing only what they want to see. What psychiatrists and psychologists are referring to here is Self-Confidence and Self-Image and this leads back to how we deal with our naturally occurring egocentrism.

It is how we deal with our perception of our surroundings in terms of Imaginary Audience, Personal Fable and Apparent Hypocrisy. A person with good Self-Confidence and Self-Image correctly gauges his own perception of himself against that of the public; in other words men do not give a shit what other people think of him as long as he enjoys doing his thing and doing it well. Men attach our confidence and image to the work that we do and not the perception people have of us. Women on the other hand, do care very much not what people think but that people are thinking of them. Women attach their confidence and image to their belief of how many people perceive them.

And we know this is true because women use communication to enhance social connections and relationships (Merchant, K. 2012: 18). Women use communication to get to know more people with the purpose of adding them to their own pool of Narcissistic Supply. The woman does not care who these people are as long as they notice her; and this is why you see women having 1,000 friends, followers and subscribers on Facebook, Twitter and Youtube; this is why women gossip and tell secrets about their BFF’s; this is why women can simply believe and spread lies about other people because it is not about others; it is always about their narcissistic need, it is always about them.

So yes, most if not all women are narcissists whether if it is a little bit or full blown.

Continued in The Female Psychosis part 3: Solipsism.

Reference
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, (2013) Marriage and Divorce. [online] Nov 13, 2013 available from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Donald, R.M. (1998) White Feather Feminism: The Recalcitrant Progeny of Radical Suffragist and Conservative Pro-War Britain. [online] Jan 13, 1998 available at Ampersand http://itech.fgcu.edu/&/issues/vol1/issue1/feather.htm [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Frost (2013) The Truth About False Rape Accusations that All Men Should Know. [online] Dec 23, 2014 available at Return of Kings http://sf-criminaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/KaninFalseRapeAllegations.pdf [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

FunnyMalaysia.Net (2013) Crazy Women beat up a worker in BeerFactory just for a pint of Guinness [online video] Sep 12, 2013 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNIToEDq2fk [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Hensley, N. (2014) Ohio Woman exposes husband’s affair with Walmart employee. [online] Mar 5, 2014 available at New York Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ohio-woman-exposes-husband-affair-walmart-employee-article-1.1711817 [accessed Mar 10, 2014

Hotchkiss, S. (2003) Why Is It Always About You? The Seven Deadly Sins of Narcissism. Free Press, Simon & Schuster, New York pp. 3-27

Jazz Wei, (2014) Malaysia Bossy Girlfriend demanding a house and a car. [online video] Feb 25, 2014 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebdi2zWF1WM [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Kanin, J.E. (1994) False Rape Allegations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 23, no.1, Plenum Publishing 1994 pp. 81 available online at criminaldefense.com http://sf-criminaldefense.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/KaninFalseRapeAllegations.pdf [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Kreger, R. (2011) What Borderlines and Narcissist Fear Most. [online] Oct 19, 2011 available at Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/stop-walking-eggshells/201110/what-borderlines-and-narcissists-fear-most-part [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Lamia, M.C. (2013) Jealousy and Envy: The Emotions of Comparison and Contrast. [online] Jul 13, 2013 available at Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/intense-emotions-and-strong-feelings/201307/jealousy-and-envy-the-emotions-comparison-and-contr [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Manwomanmyth (2010) Equality – Suffrage and UK voting rights. [online video] Feb 14, 2010 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d25esQeBoU [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Merchant, K. (2012) How Men and Women Differ: Gender Differences in Communication Styles, Influence Tactics and Leadership Styles. CMC Senior Thesis, Paper 513 Claremont McKenna College pp. 18 [online] Dec 3, 2012 available at http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1521&context=cmc_theses [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Nathanson, D.L. (1987) The Many Faces of Shame. Guilford Press, New York pp. 64

Saad, G. (2013) Are Men or Women More Likely to File for Divorce? [online] Nov 14, 2013 available at Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201311/are-men-or-women-more-likely-file-divorce [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Straughan, K. (2013) When Female Privileges Backfires. [online video] Jun 27, 2013 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eqYEVYZgdo [accessed Mar 10,2014]

Taylor, L. (2009) The Ego Epidemic: How more and more of us women have an inflated sense of our own fabulousness. [Online] Sep 14, 2009 available at The Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1213212/The-ego-epidemic-more-inflated-sense-fabulousness.html [accessed Mar 6, 2014]

The Critical G, (2013) Fat Feminist Gets Dumped and Responds Predictably. [online video] Sep 25, 2013 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JC5k859wU-M [accessed Mar 10, 2014]

Vaknin, S (n.d.) Narcissists, Narcissistic Supply and Source of Supply. [online] available as samvak http://samvak.tripod.com/faq76.html#narcissisticsupply [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Whitbourne, S.K. (2012) The Healthy Side of Narcissism. [online] Jan 24, 2012 available at Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201201/the-healthy-side-narcissism [accessed Mar 11, 2014]

Sunday, March 9, 2014

The Female Psychosis part 1: Egocentrism

Written for Going Your Own Way forum. 
Reviewed by GabrielKnight Mar 13 2014 



Nothing has moved me so deeply than that moment when I finally got it; why women think differently from men (or as the Hamster would define it, why men think differently from women). During those instances when I notice but could not explain this disparity it would often result in confusion and bewilderment. I was confused why women often contradict themselves and when caught in their own contradiction, they deflect, rationalize and falsely accuse. Their finger points to all but themselves and society accepts this as part and parcel of “values” that must be upheld.

“Eating Grass” since a child, I always knew that something was utterly amiss and unlike other Blue Pill Men, I did not dismiss or ignore that something was vehemently wrong with women. In my research for this article I came across Louann Brizendine, a neuropsychiatrist from Harvard and a self-confessed feminist who wrote a book called The Female Brain which Robin Marantz Henig (2006) of the New York Times call a “women’s magazine article” and that “Brizendine did not do a good enough job presenting scientific evidence.” What Brizendine did was to sprinkle her writing with cutesy (read neotenous) language – estrogen as the Queen, testosterone the Forceful Seducer and oxytocin as the Fluffy, Purring Kitten.

Fuck No.

I had planned to write one article regarding one specific dementia but now I decided that I would write a series of pieces under a parent title which I am calling The Female Psychosis detailing the mental conditions in women specifically Egocentrism, Narcissism, Solipsism as well as my take on the mythical and immortal Rationalization Hamster. Two caveats before we begin

  • I am neither a Psychiatrist nor Psychologist.
  • Psychology is crock.
Okay, what is all this apparent hypocrisy about psychology being balderdash when I am using psychology to ascertain the mental state of our beautiful retards? Believe it or don’t but I am quite versed in psychology and I am able to discern between psychobabble and the scientific study of mental functions and behavior. And while one half of psychology is credible, the other half is indeed a load of crock as Dr. Louann Brizendine exemplifies.

Okay, let’s get it on.

Hang On To Your Ego
To understand the Female Psychosis, we need to begin from the very beginning. Evolutionists agree that humans are neotenic and women are highly neotenous. Females share many commonalities with children both physically and psychologically therefore, by observing the cognitive development of children; we can form a basis for a reasonable deduction from their behavioral traits. One naturally occurring trait that exists in all children is Egocentrism which means being self-absorbed or that they are preoccupied with their own internal world. But it can also be defined as ”a tendency of thoughts about the self and about self-relevant information to carry more weight in shaping comparative and likelihood judgments than do thoughts about others and other-relevant information” (Chambers & Windschitl, 2008: 253). For the self-absorbed, they can only see their point of view and hence are often unable to accost or acquiesce with the facts of reality.

Simply put, Egocentrism is all about ‘Me’.

Developmental Psychologist Jean Piaget (1923) observed that children were at a stage he calls Morality of Constraints in which right and wrong is viewed as absolutes with one exception. Children of this stage believe in this despotism of rules except when those rules hinder their individual benefit (Crosser 2014). This hypocritical selfishness is called Relativistic Hedonism and can be observed when a child monopolizes toys, citing “I can’t share them because I want them!”  However, the same child would be furious when another child hoards the toys. Relativistic Hedonism allows the child to plunder without guilt or shame “because I want them!” Egocentrism prevents the child from empathizing with others emotionally and cognitively. Thus the child who is blinded with her own viewpoint has difficulty taking on other views. This can also manifest in a child’s faulty reasoning of cause and effect. The proverb ‘step on a crack and you break your mother’s back’ is a good analogy of how a child relates to her world (Crosser 2014). Often a child assumes that unrelated good and bad events occur because of her, for example she feels guilty for her parents’ divorce, or feels special when her birthday wish is granted after supplicating to whomever and whatever.

Egocentrism is also apparent in adolescence. Professor David Elkind expanded Piaget’s theory and proposed that adolescents fail to differentiate the cognitive concerns of others and those of the self and this gave rise to two mental conditions known as the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable (Lerner & Jovanovic 1999: 13). The Imaginary Audience is the teenagers’ belief of the constant feeling that they are being observed and judged (Oda 2007). They envision how friends would react to their every action and thought (Whitbourne 2012). Personal Fable is the belief adolescents hold that they are special and unique to the extent that none of the difficulties of life will affect them irrespective of their behavior. It is a sense of invulnerability and specialty commonly associated with risk-taking (Alberts, Elkind and Ginsberg 2006). An example of these 2 mental condition is the story of Dana Adiva, the 22 year old star of MTV’s ‘True Life: I’m Too Beautiful’ who thinks everyone either hates or lusts for her because she thinks she is too pretty (Murray 2013). She is quoted to say “people stare at me no matter what and it’s the most irritating thing in the world” (Imaginary Audience) as well as “I get anything I want basically. I get treated like a princess” (Personal Fable).   


InformOverload (2013)

The third and almost unknown of Elkind’s teenage ego trifecta is called Apparent Hypocrisy, which is when the adolescent expresses an idea and believes that the expression of that idea is the same as acting on it and achieving it (Bowden & Greenburg 2010: 110). Thus if a teenager believes she is successful even when she is not, then all her endeavors are wins without her need to strive for it. To give you an example, Psychology professors Jean Twenge and Keith Campbell studied 37,000 college students in 2006 and found 30 per cent of them believed that they should get good grades just by showing up (Taylor 2009). Due to this, the teenagers who subscribe to a certain ideology can act directly contrary to that belief, such as Singaporean girls agreeing that the National Service -- which is mandatory for men -- is a must but only for men and they themselves would not participate in it.


Mikeferdy (2013)

Since we know that women are childish in their behavior because of their neoteny, and that children as well as adolescents are egocentric, we can presuppose that women remain egocentric well into their adulthood. And for my good fellows, do not assume that Egocentrism is a modern day disease. The Women’s Petition Against Coffee of 1674 highlights this childish behavior. Coffee was introduced to Britain in the 1600 and had become a popular drink among the British Intelligentsia where men would gather in coffee-houses to discuss politics and philosophy (Price 2011). Even today’s women will find nothing wrong with this. But the wives of these men apparently did not agree, citing that their men were ‘Frenchified’ who had lost all interest in sex with them. They then describe how talkativeness is the prerogative of women and should only be reserved for women. If we read the petition we can observe the obvious egocentrism in them.

For besides, we have reason to apprehend and grow Jealous, That Men by frequenting these Stygian Tap-houses will usurp on our Prerogative of Tattling, and soon learn to excel us in Talkativeness: a Quality wherein our Sex has ever Claimed pre-eminence.

This paragraph is gold because it contains all of Elkind’s trinite adolescent egocentrism. The women thought that men were being talkative because the men were imitating them (Imaginary Audience). Garbage; even King Charles knew that the men were only concern about the affairs of the state. Next, the women were jealous and apprehensive that men would be better talkers than them (Personal Fable). More garbage; there are no credible evidence to support that women are better talkers than men and men do not care how or what women talk about. Then these women claim that talking is a female quality and that it is their dominion, hence men are not allowed to engage in it (Apparent Hypocrisy). This is idiocy beyond reason and can only be attributed to what can only be described as Paraphrenia or paranoid delusion. It was never about coffee; it has and always has been about women’s irrational and egotistical demands.

Now we look at the positive attribute of egocentrism. In a 2011 study on gender and competition it has been found that in stereotypical-male task, there is consensus that men and women with the same ability do not share the same willingness to compete (Niederle & Vesterlund 2011: 625). The study has found that in the labor market outcomes men prefer to compensate under a tournament scheme but women prefer a noncompetitive piece-rate scheme. According to the study, the best explanation for this is that men have more confidence in their abilities compare to women and their attitudes towards competition are different; men thrive on competition while women shy away. And yet women have the gall to claim that there is a gender gap in pay when they do not want to compete with men and want to do less work (manwomanmyth 2010).

In competition, egocentrism assumes that people tend to have more knowledge about themselves compared to others and that any assessments they make of themselves would tend to be more reliable than assessments they make of others (Windschitl et al., 2008: 254) This means that you know more about you than you do about the other guy and this is perfectly reasonable. Therefore when people need to make a comparison, they have some justification to believe in what they think of themselves than what they think about others and these people then tend to arrive at a better and more accurate judgment in their comparisons and optimism (Chambers & Windschitl, 2004: 270).

Therefore in competition, egocentrism is beneficial and crucial for men because it helps the man to make better decisions and to be more optimistic. But this has nothing to do with competition in relationships i.e. not victim against oppressor, not wife against husband, nor women against coffee. As men, we need to have confidence in ourselves if we are to compete with others for food and shelter. Egocentrism is good for competition and since men are naturally competitive, egocentrism is good for men. Women have no use for egocentrism and when they are egocentric, it is not for the purpose of getting food or shelter but for competing on looking attractive (Cashdan 1998).

Garbage

To be continued in The Female Psychosis Part 2: Narcissism

Reference
Alberts, A. Elkind, D. Ginsberg, S. (2006) The Personal Fable and Risk-Taking in Early Adolescence. [Online] Dec 19, 2006 available at http://homepages.wmich.edu/~rmckinn2/3500/Risk%20Taking%20in%20Adolescence.pdf [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

Bowden, V.R. & Greenburg, C.S., (2010) Children and Their Families: The Continuum of Care. Wolters Kluwer Health, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia pp. 110

Cashdan, E. (1998) Are Men More Competitive Than Women. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(2): 213-229 available online at PubMed.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9639863 [accessed Mar 9, 2014]

Chambers, J.R. & Windschitl, P.D. (2004) Biases in Comparative Social Judgments: The Role of Non-Motivationed Factors in Above-Average and Comparative-Optimism Effects. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 130, no. 5, 813-838, University of Iowa.

Crosser, S. (2014), Emerging Morality: How Children Think About Right and Wrong. [Online] available at Earlychildhood News http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleID=118 [accessed Mar 6, 2014]

Henig, R.M. (2006) How Women Think. [Online] Sep 10, 2006 available at The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/10/books/review/Henig.t.html?_r=2& [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

InformOverload, (2013), Woman Says Being Too Pretty Ruined Her Life – Dana Adiva. [online] Jun 4, 2013 available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wps1OHs459M [accessed Mar 7, 2013]

Lerner, R.M. Jovanovic, J. (1999) Cognitive and moral development and academic achievement in adolescence. Taylor & Francis, U.S.A. pp. 13

Manwomanmyth (2010) Equality – The Pay Gap 2/3. [online] Feb 15, 2010 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RscKyvgw-Y4 [accessed Mar 9, 2014]

Mikeferdy (2013), Singapore’s most hypocritical girl. [online] Dec 7, 2013 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDto2JLbzoA [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

Murray, R (2013) Meet the women who complain they’re too beautiful for their own good on MTV’s True Life. [online] Jun 3, 2013 available at The Daily News http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/women-complain-beautiful-article-1.1361968 [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

Niederle, M. & Vesterlund, L. (2011), Gender and Competition. Annual Review Economics, 3: 601-630 doi 10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122 pp. 625 available at www.annualreviews.org http://www.stanford.edu/~niederle/NV.AnnualReview.Print.pdf [accessed Mar 9, 2014]

Oda, A.Y. (2007) David Elkind and the Crisis of Adolescence: Review, Critique and Application. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 251-256 available at http://www.zvitoren.com/files/david%20elkind%20about%20teenagers.pdf [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

Piaget, J. (2002), The Language and Thought of a Child. 3rd Edition, Routledge Classics, New York 1959 pp. 9-10

Price, W.F. (2011), The 1674 Women’s Campaign Against Coffee. [online] Apr 15, 2011 available at Spearhead http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/04/15/the-1674-womens-campaign-against-coffee/ [accessed Mar 8, 2014]

Taylor, L. (2009) The Ego Epidemic: How more and more of us women have an inflated sense of our own fabulousness. [Online] Sep 14, 2009 available at The Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1213212/The-ego-epidemic-more-inflated-sense-fabulousness.html [accessed Mar 6, 2014]

Whitborne, S.K. (2012) It’s a Fine Line Between Narcissim and Egocentrism. [Online] April 7, 2012 available at Psychology Today http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201204/it-s-fine-line-between-narcissism-and-egocentrism [accessed Mar 7, 2014]

Windschitl, P.D. Rose, J.P. Stalkfleet, M.T. and Smith, A.R. (2008), Are People Excessive or Judicious in their Egocentrism? A Modelling Approach to Understanding Bias and Accuracy in People’s Optimism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 95, No.2, 253-273, University of Iowa pp. 253, 254 available online at http://www2.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/windschitl/PDFs/JPSP%202008%20(WRSS).pdf [accessed Mar 6, 2014]

Friday, March 7, 2014

One by One

We don’t feel gravity but we know it’s there; the natural phenomenon by which all physical bodies attracts each other; the agent that gives weight to physical objects. We don’t feel that it is occurring and most of the time most of us fail to notice the apple falling from the tree, until one man observed it and was thoughtful enough to asked the question why, and then proceeded to give humanity one of the greatest intellectual leap forward.

Tonight I went out with my brother; the same brother who I’ve laid the groundwork to take the Red Pill. By all accounts he’s an herbivore man just like me; he has rejected women and opted to live a life for himself, by himself. I know if I handled it carefully, the Red Pill will liberate him. A month prior, I gave him advice on how to manage his weight and fitness. He was struggling but I know I could help and I had the evidence backing it up. He was receptive and I saw how conscious he was of what he ate; I got through to him. Noticing this I told him about some articles that I wrote; about how Japan is fucked up and about this movement in U.S and Europe that is gaining ground. It was like Fight Club; we can’t talk about it in the open (which is true because you never know how a person is going to react). But he seems interested and asked for more information in private conversation.

Not so fast, I needed to test him. I asked him what he thought of modern women. “They’re rubbish” he replied; excellent. His answer was swift and without hesitation. He was able to be completely honest with me in private and he wasn’t afraid to speak his mind but I needed to be sure. “Why do you think they’re rubbish?” I asked. “They’re full of drama. I don’t need that shit,” his answer was gratifying, I had no more doubts. I told him about the Red Pill, about the Blue Pill men, Men Going Their Own Way and PickUp Artists community. He listened intently and his response was amazing, “Yeah, women are using sex to control men!” I was curious; this is quite insightful for an Herbivore man.

As it turns out, he confessed that he had been lurking PickUp Artists sites for a while but he didn't learn about Men Going Their Own Way. This made things so much easier. We spent an hour talking about how women are rubbish, how the Blue Pill men of society are idiots, how we chose to not conform to standards and are living the epic life. And I told him more about Men Going Their Own Way and how it is growing. How one by one, more and more men are waking up, wising up and opting out of the system. He seems interested but I know it’s a process, not an event. It’ll take him time to digest but just like gravity, the Red Pill is a natural phenomenon that attracts physical bodies to each other and an agent that gives weight. The apple is falling; I just need to wait for it to reach his head.

And the next time we meet, instead of talking about women, we’ll talk about how as men we are awesome.

Monday, March 3, 2014

Neoteny

written for Going Your Own Way forum. Reviewed & Edited by BeijaFlor

Have you ever pondered why some western men are attracted to Asian girls? Are you perhaps among those who are perplexed on why western men find Asian girls appealing?  The answer lies in Neoteny. In this article, I attempt to provide the break down and the lowdown on Neoteny as well as the world’s fascination, obsession, celebration and perversion of it. Now, there are several aspects to Neoteny; anthropological, physiological, physical, psychological and evolutionary. To delve deep into each category would be far beyond the scope of this article but I will cover relevant aspects from each of them. 
 
Forever Young
British American Anthropologist Ashley Montagu in his 1989 work Growing Young simply described Neoteny as Juvenilization. This view is shared by American Paleontologist and Evolutionary Theorist Steven Jay Gould (2008) who described Neoteny as “progressive juvenilization as an evolutionary phenomenon”. He proposed that humans “have evolved by retaining to adulthood the originally juvenile features of our ancestors. I myself am rather taken by renowned scientist JBS Haldane’s definition of Neoteny as the “preservation of embryonic and infantile traits” as well as the “retardation of the developmental rates in humans” (Montagu 1989: 222-224).

In case you missed that, Neoteny is the preservation of childishness and the retardation of maturity.

There is of course, the laymen’s explanation of Neoteny which include “maintaining youthful characteristics into adulthood,” (Merlin 2003) and “the physiological (or somatic) development of an animal or organism is slowed or delayed,” (Phneah 2012) and my favorite, “when cuteness is retained after an animal reaches adulthood,” (Dickinson 2012). These are examples of Neoteny as expressed by women and to be fair these definitions are not wrong but they are inaccurate and too confined within political correctness that belies the breadth and depth of its meaning, which includes the distinct practice and philosophy of childish traits, appearances and behaviors.

Neoteny is essentially Childish-ism, and I aim prove this claim.

Do the Evolution

The general consensus among evolutionists is that animals as well as humans are indeed neotenic and were needed to be to ensure the continuing survival of the species. Zoologist and Nobel Prize winner Konrad Lorenz proposed that cuteness “motivates caretaking behavior in human, with the evolutionary function of enhancing the offspring survival” (Glocker et al., 2009). In other words, the reason babies and puppies are cute is to elicit a nurturing response in adults to ensure the adults care for them.

And unfortunately, we are biologically programmed to respond to cuteness.

Two hormones called Vasopressin and Oxytocin suffuses the adult brain and programs it to send tsunamis of pleasurable emotions that turn an observer into protector and provider (Sanello 2011). Oxytocin and Vasopressin are key hormones in the neuroanatomy of intimacy, particularly in pair bonding and social attachment (Young & Wang, 2004). So yes, every single one of us is highly susceptible to the effect of the attractiveness of cute things.

To give you a perspective, here is a simple narrative. Keep in mind that a girl reaches sexual maturity at the average age of 14 years hence she would appear and behave as a child in all other ways. Our caveman ancestor met 14 year old cavegirl, his hormones stimulated his neurological impulses and he responds. Cavegirl agrees to mate with cavemen with the condition that he protects her from the environment as well as providing a nest and eatables. Repeat for 3,000 generations then lo and behold, cavegirl’s childish traits were passed down and perfected till it reached us.

And we know this is possible when we look at the rapid evolution of diverse dog breeds. Many adult dogs are similar to puppies in their behavior and morphology. The breed differentiation in the dog is believed to be possibly based on neotenic processes so that some morphological or physiological traits delayed at a particular developmental stage may become characteristics of the breed (Trut et al., 2004). To put it simply, dogs behave and look appealing because they retain their puppy-ish features when humans domesticated and bred them.

In our example, when our cavemen ancestors mated with 14 year old cavegirl, this would produce women who retain their childish traits and cavegirls would best remain childish to be cute and appealing if they are to attract other cavemen who will protect and provide for them.

Physical Graffiti
So how do we quantify cute and appealing? In a 2009 study of facial characteristics between two groups of Italian beauty contestants against women in a reference group, it was found the two groups of beauty contestants share similar traits which include larger forehead, smaller jaw as well as broader, flatter and more rounded face. The attractive Italian women had faces characterized by more "babyness" traits compared to the "normal" women used as a reference (Sforza et al., 2009).

Women look like children and what’s more, they want to look like children.

We can verily observe this by looking from the laymen’s definition given earlier; “maintaining youth” as well as “cuteness retained” underlie the desire to be young that is to remain a child. This lust for youthfulness has spawned a pointless need that women indulge in and are willing to pay for. A study of 2000 British women found that the average woman spends £18,000 or $30,000 on her face in her lifetime which includes £9,500 or $15,000 on make-up (Waterlow 2013). British women spend an equivalent of buying a car to look juvenile; it is insane.
Before and After Makeup

And because men are attracted to young and pretty things due to neurological fireworks as well as the biological imperative to mate; women know that men who are interested in them will offer protection and provision, hence these women will present themselves in a such a way to attract as many men as they can for the purpose of mining vast amount of resources otherwise known as money and influence. Sex sells because women look neotenous and men respond to neoteny.

This has led to the supposed sexual objectification of women -- but note that it was originally brought on by women as a tool to control men. Women deliberately entice men while at the same time they reprimand and shame them for having natural sexual urges. This works to lower the supply of sex and inflate women's sexual value. As their value rises, so too does their influence; and they can command the terms of the negotiation for the protection and provision offered by men.

And men have agreed and adhered to all the unfair and unjust terms dictated by women.

Sad but True
Stardusk (2013) mentioned that “if women have evolved to have juvenile features, and men prefer this, and women are protected to the greater extent from the ravages of life by said men, having been taken care of for the most part in the past; it stands to reason that mentally a great portion of women have remained – psychologically speaking – in certain respects in an arrested state of development in their behavior, a behavior that can readily be likened to as a child.

In our example of caveman and cavegirl; because our ancestors mated with juveniles – with the mental capacity of a child - for 3,000 generations, it is more than likely that through these natural selective breeding women retained psychologically childish tendencies and behaviors. And we can observe and compare this behavior of women with the children of today. Children whine and throw tantrums, women nag and throw hysterics; children can only think about themselves, women are largely concerned with only their wants; children think they are helpless victims and so do women.

Below are examples and a comparison of behaviors exhibited by a woman and two children;



Oh yeah, it’s ugly. Now compare that video to the one below



The similarities between the woman and the children in the two videos above are palpable and telling. Whether it is inborn or acquired or intentional or inadvertent, the fact of the matter is that women are childish in their appearance and behavior. They resist and retard any attempt to mature both physically and mentally. Childish-ism is very much the core of women’s mental processes.

Karen Straughan (2012) stated to the effect that when men perceived women as juvenile, they are not taken seriously which contributes to men disregarding adult female disorderly behavior. This is overly simplistic and I would like to expand on this. I think when a woman behaves like a child i.e. throwing tantrums; both men and women see that this is unacceptable behavior in any adult. However, when a woman has high neotenous physical features i.e. she looks cute and pretty; then this woman can attract men and women who are infatuated with her due to their Oxytocin and Vasopressin firing in their brain that they will deliberately overlook her disruptive behavior i.e. Too Pretty For Prison syndrome. And we know that when a child throws a tantrum, is hurting or cries, it compels adults to mollycoddle and give in to the child and this has been a highly successful strategy for highly neotenous women too.

It is a winning strategy that has worked since caveman met 14 year old cavegirl 100,000 years ago when cavemen had to provide cavegirl a comfy den and delectable cuisine as well as protect her from saber-tooth tigers. Men have allowed these childish women to get away with their hysterics because they are intoxicated by the idea of sex. But whilst men have evolved and progressed from caves to space stations, women continue to stagnate in the comfort of the man that fulfilled her needs and wants. At least cavegirl honored her contract by having intercourse with cavemen. The modern woman do not honor her contract with her man, entraps him into fatherhood that he has no say in, dangles the sex carrot to turn him into slave labor and once she has exhausted him of his resources, she readily leaves him with no remorse, shame or responsibility (manwomanmyth, 2010).

And men still let women get away with it. We need to stop doing this.

Around the World
In my opening I asked the question why some western men prefer Asian girls. Montagu (1989: 13) found that Mongoloid skulls in particular of Chinese and Japanese variety are more neotenized compared to others. This is not surprising considering that China and Japan not only excel in neoteny; they celebrate it. The Japanese and Chinese often produce and reward women who are petite, have small hands and feet, large eyes, round faces and soft jaws; Asian women are more commonly cute (not that other women aren't). 

Blogger Seminal Thoughts (2013) proclaimed, and I agree with him, that Japan is the most neotenous in the world. In what specific areas you ask? Everything; the Japanese neotenized any and all from their 3rd century B.C. Haniwa clay figures, to 8th century Fat Buddha statues, to their food, cars, clothes and women; the Kawaii or Cutesy trend is a Japanese pop-culture identity heavily ingrained in their national psyche and this has spilled over to China, South Korea and South East Asia.

Kawaii Hello Kitty Smart Car by Sanrio and Smart

Kawaii Pikachu Boxed Lunch

Cute Japanese Girl

Now, I will go on record to say that this is not something to be proud of. As we know, neoteny is not only a physical attribute but also a psychological one. And East Asians, having the most neotenous looking females in the world, also produces the most infantile and juvenile women in existence. In China, women are prone to “Sa Jiao” which is a set of behaviors characterized by being spoiled, clingy and coquettish (Larson-Wang, 2012). In SEA, the equivalent to “Sa Jiao” is “Manja,” and it is readily seen in women of Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand.

Here is a video of a Cantonese wife throwing a tantrum for not getting soup



And here is a clip of an elderly woman in a fit just to show you that this behavior is widespread



There’s no English equivalent for Sa Jiao and Manja but I say that this is the epitome of Childish-ism which is rampant and so entrenched in Asia due to centuries of Asians traditionally and specifically seeking childisistic women to mate with and it has resulted in a pandemic of psychotic and neurotic females. Yeah, we fucked it up. And here is where a good argument can be made against traditionalism in Asia and perhaps the world over; and that is, traditionalism enables Neoteny and sires Childish-ism which has perpetrated and perpetuated the dysfunction and malfunction of women.

This is what Barbarossaa (2014) alluded to when he said “one must ask themselves whether or not we are actually deluding our species by allowing stay at home mothers and indeed women as a whole – half of our species after all – to get by in life with much less need to pursue intellectual endeavor,” and that “we have to do away with this powered by orgasm method of sustaining this civilization and adopt a powered by intellectual endeavor civilization.”

If we are to progress as a species, we need to stop reproducing using defective materials.

Boys to Men
Bless you if you have read this far. Neoteny is not exclusive to women; men also display neoteny though not at all the same. Physically, men are not generally neotenous, and certainly nowhere near as neotenous as women. However, psychologically men do retain a certain degree of childish behavior and mental processes both that are of benefit and detriment.

American Scholar Warren G. Bennis (2002: 20) explained Neoteny as “the retention of all those wonderful qualities that we associate with youth: curiosity, playfulness, eagerness, fearlessness, warmth, energy.” Bennis is describing the qualities that leaders still preserve as they age. What Bennis understated and what I feel is powerful, is that these traits; curiosity, playfulness, eagerness, fearlessness, warmth and energy; are all neotenous traits of boys. Bennis is effectively saying that men who carried with them their neotenous boyish behaviors into adulthood become great leaders and indeed these are laudable traits to have and should be cultivated.

However, I believe there is a definite detriment from the retention of boys’ psychological neotenous traits. Stardusk (2013) explained that the mother is a giver of care and nurture to the son and there is a state of discontinuity of what the man seeks moving from the mother to the sexual female partner. A man will not be given the same love and care from his wife as he used to receive from his mother. Stardusk hypothesize that this is the psychological origins of the residual Male Mother Need that exists in men. It could very well be that the Male Mother Need is a byproduct of men’s psychological neoteny and the perversion of it can lead to disturbing behavior and poor life choices as has been documented in the case of Bernard Boursicot.

However, if we assume Bennis to be true, then without doubt as thinking men we should attempt to revisit and reengage our boyish traits and develop them. Sandman (2014) pondered “why were we devoting our time to home decorating instead of space exploration and exploring our minds,” and “if we understood that we can learn and grow in the vastness of the universe and never become bored, then women are just some sideshow beggar tail.” Men are explorers and discoverers, and to be explorers and discoverers men need to be curious of wonders, eager to pursue, fearless towards adversity, active in our endeavors and just have a positive outlook on life. These are the traits that we once had in older and happier times because we used to engage the world with this attitude.

In The End
Physical Neoteny is not an absolute evil. We must understand that we biologically susceptible to cute and pretty things but there is a need to control the self from becoming infatuated to the point it skews our good judgement that we are guilty of unjust; there is no such thing as Too Pretty For Prison. 

What is more disconcerting is Psychological Neoteny, specifically in women who indulge in childishness, who suffer from Childish-ism, and who inflict harm upon others only to satisfy their own selfish greed and interest; we need to separate ourselves from these toxic women lest they make prey of us, rob us of our fortune and leave us destitute. 

We also need to reflect on our own psychological neoteny specifically those boyish traits of fearlessness, eagerness, playfulness, curiosity, energy and warmth. We need to relearn to become explorers and discoverers of our world again. 

When Barbarossaa jokingly refer to women as the 'beautiful retards,' I laughed my ass off because he hit the nail right on the head. They are in fact beautiful and they are in fact retards. And we don't want them to be retards; we want them to be the best that they can be but they can only achieve that if they stop being children and we start treating them as adults whose worth is proven by merit. 

Reference
Barbarossaa, (2013), Powered by Orgasm part 3. [Online Video] Dec 21 2012 available at Bar Bar Channel Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id-1NXz8Fjc [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Bennis, W.G. & Thomas R.J. (2002) Geeks and Geezers: How Era, Values and Defining Moments Shapes Leaders. Harvard Business School Publishing.  p. 20

Dickinson, K. (2012) Pros and Cons of Being a Cute Adult. [Online] Feb 18 2012 available at Real Clear Science http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2012/02/adult%20cuteness.html [Accessed Mar 1 2014]

Fun Support, (2009) Psycho Asian Woman Throws Tantrum Over Soup. [Online Video] Jul 14, 2009 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0iuQAKo9js [accessed March 4, 2014]

Glocker, M.L. Langleben, D.D. Ruparel, K. Loughead, J.W. Valdez, J.N. Griffin, M.D. Sachser & N. Gur, R.C., (2009) Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. [Online] Apr 10, 2009 available at Slash Docs http://www.slashdocs.com/mvtpxm/baby-schema-modulates-the-brain-reward-system-in-nulliparous-women-on-lorenz-and-others.html [accessed March 1, 2014]

Gould, J.S. (2008), A Biological Homage to Mickey Mouse, Ecotone, volume 4, Numbers 1&2. [Online] available open source http://todd.jackman.villanova.edu/hlinks.html [accessed March 1, 2014]

Larson-Wang, J.A. (2012), What are You 5? Chinese Women and Sa Jiao. [Online] Dec 21, 2012 available at eChinacities http://www.echinacities.com/news/What-are-You-Five-Chinese-Women-and-Sa-Jiao?cmteditid=#page_cmt [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Man Woman and Myth (2010) Family - Divorce and Toxic Women. [Online Video] Jun 8, 2010 available at manwomanmyth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOpOSdMaJpI [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Merlin, S. (2003), Forever Neotenic [Online] available at Merlin Works Newsletter, http://merlin-works.com/merlin-works-newsletter-forever-neotenic/ [accessed Mar 1, 2014]

Montagu, A. (1989), Growing Young, Greenwood Publishing Group pp. 13, 207-247 http://books.google.com.my/books?id=EoTXLpEX-h4C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false [accessed March 1, 2014]

Phneah, J. (2012), The Science Behind Cuteness. [Online] Mar 1, 2012 available at Jeraldine’s Blog http://jeraldine-phneah.blogspot.com/2012/03/the-science-behind-cuteness.html [accessed Mar 1, 2013]

Rice Tea, (2009), Crazy Woman Throws Tantrum after Missing Flight. [Online Video] Feb 16, 2009 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfHktRSuDyc [accessed March 4, 2014]

Sandman, (2014), The Princess and MGTOW. [Online Video] Feb 8, 2014 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXYEAmsFs48 [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Sanello, F. (2011), Neoteny: Survival of the Cutest. [Online] Sep 13, 2011 available at Red Room http://redroom.com/member/frank-sanello/writing/neoteny-survival-of-the-cutest-or-why-babies-puppies-and-kittens-charm- [accessed March 1 2014]

Seminal Thoughts, (2013), Most Neotenous in the World: Japan. [Online] Jun 14, 2013 available at Seminal Thoughts Blogspot, http://seminalthought.blogspot.com/2013/06/most-neotenous-in-world-japan.html?showComment=1393651965769 [accessed March 1, 2014]

Sforza, C. Laino, A. D'Alessio, R. Grandi, G. Binelli, M. & Ferrario, V.F. (2009), Soft-Tissue Facial Characteristics of Attractive Italian Women as Compared to Normal Women. [Online] Jan 2009 available at National Centre for Biotechnology Information http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19123721 [accessed March 1 2014]

Stardusk, (2013), Psychological Origins of the Male Mother Need. [Online Video] Oct 1, 2013 available at ThinkingApe-TV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9nDSEsUOqA [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Stardusk, (2013), Neoteny, Hypoagency and Nefarious Consequence Solipsism. [Online Video] Dec 7 2013 available at ThinkingApe-TV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejTZJamw1Tw [accessed Mar 3, 2014]

Straughan, K., (2012) Neoteny! [Online Video] Aug 22, 2012 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C46rSIfTum4 [accessed Mar 4, 2014]

Spell, S (2011), Spoiled Kids in Walmart. [Online Video] Oct 22, 2011 available at Steve Spell II channel Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IM1p-Tn-jA [accessed March 3, 2014]

Trut, L.N. Plyusnina, I.Z. Oskina, I.N. (2004), An Experiment on Fox Domestication and Debatable Issues of Evolution of Dog. Russian Journal of Genetics [Online] Aug 12 2013 available at https://courses.washington.edu/englhtml/junxu/ENGL_199C/04_An_Experiment_on_Fox_Domestication.pdf [accessed March 1 2014]

Waterlow, L. (2013), Price of Beauty: Average woman will spend more than £18,000 on her face in her lifetime. [Online] Sep 11, 2013 available at The Daily Mail http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2417796/The-average-woman-spend-18-000-face-lifetime.html [accessed March 3 2014]

Worldmedia, (2013), Time for a divorce Husband films his wife throwing a tantrum. [Online Video] Jul 22, 2013 available at Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEPoO08IMog [accessed March 1, 2014]

Young, L.J. & Wang, Z.X. (2004), The neurobiology of pair bonding. [Online] Sep 26, 2004 available at Nature Neuroscience http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v7/n10/full/nn1327.html [accessed March 1 2014]