Let me say that hunting down
and reading the online materials regarding the various explanations on the Realization
Hamster has been arduous. However, many of the literature and commentary
that I have read were indeed helpful even when I do not agree with some of
them. I am going to take the opportunity here to address some of the commentary
that I find relevant as a starting point to the Hamster discussion.
The Rationalization Hamster is a combination of
Self-Discrepancy, Cognitive Dissonance and Rationalization theories: AGREED - Yes and my theories actually support
these theories as much as these theories support mine. Read them to get a
better perspective of the Hamster. Kudos to bsutansalt of TRP and vote this up
if you’re a member.
The Hamster is a Logic Wheel: FALSE - If you read my article on Solipsism,
you know why this is false. The Hamster is not spurred on logic; it is driven
by emotions, wants and needs thus are often irrational. The Hamster appeals to
your feelings, not your rationale.
Men have the Hamster too: WRONG - This myth is extremely prevalent
among Blue Pill and Red Pill women. The
argument is that men rationalize their behavior as much as women. This is
fucking bogus and I’ll tell you why. First, rationalization means giving excuses;
this is what a child does and we forgive children because they don’t know any
better. Women give excuses far too often and they receive the Pussy Pass. But
when men give excuses, we condemn him (as we should) for acting like a child.
Men don’t forgive other men for their excuses; we punish him when he’s doing
wrong. What men do is not rationalization but justification. We give evidence
to attempt, prove and convince others that what we say, do or think is right.
Rationalization is pleading to another person’s emotional sense while
justification is convincing another’s intellectual sense; that’s the
difference. And if you see any man and woman making excuses for his or
her actions without just cause, reprimand them and don’t let them get away with
it or you’ll just enabling their behavior.
The Hamster implies women are stupid: NOT
EXACTLY - This one
is taken from KittyHamilton -- a Blue Pill woman -- in the PurplePillDebate
Subreddit. If you read my article on Solipsism I explain the difference between
stupidity and having a solipsistic view.
My definition of the Rationalization Hamster implies that women are
insane and infantile to varying degrees; and I have given evidence why I can
sufficiently claim so.
You can use the Hamster to your advantage (in
game): WHATEVER - This
one is made by veggie_girl in TRP. Yeah, I don’t care.
Now that we have covered that, I will move on
to explain what I believe the Hamster really is. Now I admit that as far as the
theories in this series go, this one is the hardest to explain and to pin down
simply because there hasn’t been anyone to have really studied it. This is my
attempt to investigate the Hamster but much like a Black Hole swimming in the
ocean of the vast universe, you can only speculate – with some approximation
and within a reasonable margin of errors – the nature of the Hamster in the
subterranean and convoluted recesses of the female mind.
I will admit, that I might be entirely wrong and
making a fool of myself but I don’t think I am.
Regardless, I think this article is a good
starting point to really understand what the Hamster is, how it operates, why
does it seem invincible and how does it sustain itself with the added bonus of
some personal suggestions on how to defeat it.
Yes, there is a way to defeat the hamster.
The Number of the Beast
Let us recap.
In parts 1, 2 and 3 of this series I explained
with evidence of apparent Female Psychoses. From there, we know that most if
not all women are Egocentric, Narcissistic and Solipsistic to varying degrees
and these 3 mental conditions are related and support each other as shown in
the diagram above. The relationship between these 3 separate but similar mental
conditions is crucial because it highlights the psychology of the female mind and
the Rationalization Hamster is born from that mind. So, if you have not read
the previous parts of this series, I suggest you do or you will not be able to
fully appreciate the nature of the Hamster.
So what definitions do we have when people talk
about the Hamster? One definition says that
’It is the tendency for women to use
rationalization to resolve mental conflict and avoid cognitive dissonance. The
core mechanism that allows women to say one thing and do different a thing.’
The Red Pill subreddit
This definition is too general and implies that
men have the Hamster too which men do not. The problem with this definition is
the ‘core mechanism’ part of it. I explained in the previous articles
that women say and do different things because of the naturally occurring
egocentric nature of Relativistic Hedonism which is apparent in all children
who have solipsistic view of the world. The definition also implies that the
Hamster rationalizes first before the woman acts and this is contradictory. If
we look at how children behave; they will act first before thinking and when
they have committed a faux pas, they would then give excuses. Rationalizing
then only comes after the action is performed and not before hence the above
definition is inaccurate; but it’s pretty close.
The Private Man (2011) probably offered the
best explanation of the Hamster;
The
rationalization hamster is an analogy for the thought processes used by women
to turn bad behavior and bad decisions into acceptable ones to herself and her
friends. When a woman makes a bad decision, the hamster spins in its wheel (the
woman’s thinking) and creates some type of acceptable reasons for that bad
decision. The crazier the decisions, the faster the hamster must spin in order
to successfully rationalize away the insanity. When the hamster
rationalizes successfully, a woman can divorce herself from the consequences of
her bad decision or behavior.
My only criticism of this however, is that it
is an explanation of what the Hamster does, not what it is.
Despite that, Private Man has laid down some fine observations regarding the
Hamster. For one, he observed that the Hamster does spin the wheel faster when
women behave more erratic, thus we can safely presuppose that the Hamster is a
product of a larger female systemic psychosis; women are mentally ill. Second,
Private Man observed that after the Hamster successfully rationalizes a
dysfunction, the woman self-vindicates from the results of her actions; this
statement here is key and I agree with this observation for it alludes to the
core purpose of the Hamster.
You see, we know women are crazy and that they
rationalize their madness but we never asked why women act insane; we always
assume that they were born that way (which is controversially true) but what
need does a woman have to be mentally retarded when we know they are capable of
critical thought. This is the contradiction and I believe all of this goes back
to the female psyche of Egocentrism, Narcissism and Solipsism.
Hence, I hypothesize that below is what the
Hamster really is.
Kyo’s Model of the Female Psychosis: The Rationalization
Hamster
Please note that even though I tried my best to
make it sensible, this is still a working model. If anyone would like to
enhance this model, be my guest. Note, that I won’t be doing like Sunshine Mary
(2013) and give a Hamsterlation of various female lies and nonsense; we
have all heard them and like what The Private Man rightly observed, the end
result is always “it’s not my fault.” What I would like to do is expand
on The Private Man’s observation.
Schism
In part 1 of my series, I stated that for the
Egocentric, they can only see their point of view and hence are often unable to
accost or acquiesce with the facts of reality. And again this is the key
purpose of the Hamster; the egocentric is unable to reconcile her own wants and
desires with the truth of reality and so she makes excuses for the purpose of
escaping reality and retreat to the only place she knows to be safe for her
which is her own mind.
What the Rationalization Hamster is all about,
is creating a Safe Space for the woman.
That is why women are solipsistic because they
feel safe in their own minds where they do not ever doubt themselves. Women fear
reality and they build defenses and mechanisms to protect them from the
harshness of the real world. Being not able to cope with real life, they would obviously
feel ashamed of themselves but they cannot handle shame because that would mean
they are worthless which would cause them to doubt themselves and so, they rationalize their thoughts, speech and
behavior in an attempt to convince themselves that what they had done is
justified for them.
And if you look at my model, you will notice that
I painted the center black. This represents the woman’s Insecurities; they subconsciously
realize that they are wrong because in the real world dysfunctional behavior is
unacceptable for adults but they cannot accept their own weaknesses. So,
instead of dealing their insecurities like an adult they nurtured an
extraordinary beast to protect them from those feelings of insecurities. The woman’s shame led to her Narcissism, her
doubt for the world led to Solipsism and her fear for reality led to her Egocentrism.
The Hamster’s true purpose then is to protect
the woman's Insecurities; her fear of reality, her own shame of her self-worth and the doubt that
she has in her mind. It is the bastion of a woman’s Safe Spaces.
And because the woman believes that only she is
right and thus reality is wrong, and she cannot cope with her own insecurities,
she makes effort to change reality to make it conform to her mental vision of a
Safe Space in the real world. Feminism and Gynocentrism is that vehicle for her
to realize that fantasy and to turn every place she inhabits into a safe space
for her, even if it intrudes on others. How feminists were able to fool all
women into participating in this facade is by using the Hamster to appeal to
other women’s own insecurities against a make believe enemy that is vague and
readily identifiable; the Patriarchy.
The Patriarchy is in fact a delusion made to
represent the real world; a world full of Unsafe Spaces for the woman, a world
that would humiliate her, makes her doubt her worth and image.
And why do this fear, doubt and shame persist in the woman? It all goes back to part 2 of my series. I mentioned that
men have good self-confidence and self-image because we evaluate our worth
according to the work we do and not how people perceive us. Men don’t give a
fuck about what people think as long as we enjoy what we want to do and are
good at doing it. Women, because they are afraid of the real world, they fear
being embarrassed and fearful to admit that they are not all what they assume
to be, found comfort and attention in others and translated this to self-image
and self-worth hence, they did not find the need to improve themselves.
This means that the dysfunction and malfunction
of women will never be resolved; there is and always will be a disparity
between the female Safe Space and the real world. That is why women continue to
want for more stuff – resources, status, security etcetera -- because these
things do not fix the real problem, which is for those very women to grow up.
They need to fend for themselves, confront the hardships of the world, learn to
live with their embarrassment and foster a strong confident self-worth that is
not tied with public perception. To do that, we men need to stop pandering
women and start making them compete – really compete – with us in the real
world.
We need to treat women like they are true
competitive rivals. They need to work hard to get food, shelter and the
comforts of life that they all take for granted.
Killing ‘Me’ Softly
Now that we have identified the Hamster we can
devised strategies to defeat it and no, there is no polite way of doing it. The
good news is, MGTOW and Herbivore Men have correctly guessed how to defeat the
Hamster and have taken necessary steps. I am going to give suggestions on how
to defeat the Hamster and though I have found that it works for me, this is
anecdotal at best and at worst isolated and circumstantial. Please read and
consider if it applies to your situation and if it does not, abandon my
suggestions, form your own and share with as many people as you can.
But first we identify the goal. In my previous
3 articles you might have noticed that I did not address how to deal with each
mental condition; that is because the best time to deal with egocentrism,
narcissism and solipsism is when you are young. Since we are a little late to
the party, there was no point of me telling you how to deal your child’s
childish behavior. And since they had ample time to develop, all 3 mental
conditions have consolidated and form a strong structure which is the Hamster.
The Hamster is superbly proficient in
deflecting, defending and retaliating against mental assaults, reason and
criticism because all 3 of egocentrism, narcissism and solipsism are acting as
a single unit and it spins the wheel that is Feminism and Gynocentrism which
include Misandry and the Pussy Pass. So you cannot use a single strategy to
defeat the Hamster; it has to be a united and concerted siege campaign.
First, if you look at the model, you can see
that Feminism does not contribute directly to any of the mental conditions.
This is because Feminism is simply a politicized manifestation of the Female
Psychoses; it is the Female Psychoses except bigger thus it contributes nothing
except expanding the female Safe Space with the help of Gynocentrism. And Gynocentrism
feeds the Hamster with Narcissistic Supply and the Pussy Pass or male
dismissive attitude towards female dysfunction.
The female solipsism forms the basic tenets of Feminism
that in turn, encourages society to be more gynocentric. Gynocentrism enables
women’s maladaptive patterns of behavior and cognition and thus allow women’s
narcissism to exploit men to their own benefit which is to serve Feminism; you
got to admit, this is some wicked ass genius system the Hamster developed. So,
this reciprocity is analogous to the often irrational but highly effective
female rationalization.
I am sure you already guessed what our strategy
to defeat the Hamster is but let me just spell it out. Our first priority,
which has been reiterated by MGTOW and is practiced by Herbivore Men, is to
stop feeding the Hamster and starve it i.e. No More Pussy Pass, no more attention,
no more White Knighting and no more vagina for money. We need to cut off the
Narcissistic Supply just as the Herbivore Men did in Japan and women will be
concern and afraid because they have just lost their meal ticket. We need to
stop being exploited by women either for slave labor or emotional tampon.
The second strategy of our campaign which MGTOWs
have correctly applied is the relentless assault on the beliefs held by
Feminism. What we want to do is give more men the Red Pill because once they
realize that they have been fooled, exploited and used; they will stop adhering
to Gynocentrism and thus will stop feeding the Hamster as well.
How do we do this to the individual woman?
Well, firstly stop giving them attention. No
response is the best response. Do not pay them any more attention than they are
due. Don’t get them coffee, don’t by them chocolates, don’t give them gifts, don’t
gossip with them, don’t get involve with them in social media. Just Don’t. If
you work with women then just focus on the work and not on the women. Next, you
need to make women compete with you. Remember, you are designed as a Human
Doing and are capable of fantastic feats that women find difficulty in
achieving. Don’t waste your efforts by pandering to women and doing what they
want you to do; let them do it by themselves and force them to really work.
Make them feel the pain of working the same amount of overtime that you are doing.
I assure you that over a long period of time, she will wake up from that
experience and if she does not, then that is the kind of woman you do not want
to be working with anyway.
You also need to start reprimand women when you
see them indulging in their false feministic beliefs. Remember, feminism
encourages gynocentrism and gynocentrism is the exploitation of you. So you do
not want the women to be spreading propaganda that would enslave you to them. Argue
with them if they have a stupid idea like #banbossy and if you can, prove to
them that they are wrong by using examples, logic and reasoning. They will
disagree with you – they are solipsistic after all – but the point is not to
win the argument; the point is to make them doubt themselves. Their Hamster
will start to spin the wheel violently to find the most absurd counter-argument
that has nothing to do with the topic; ridicule and patronize them when they
resort to this. You will know that you have gotten to them when they retreat
from the argument and start resorting to cheap insults and sarcasm to try and
shame you due to their Arrogance and Envy; respond by pointing out their
childish behavior.
Remember to engage the fight in a calm and
rational manner; take the intellectual and rational high ground so that when
they become irrational, you can display their dramatic, erratic and emotionally
disturbing psychosis to the public. Pick your fights wisely; do not engage in a
fight without some documented evidence of it or she can claim sexual
harassment. It is best to engage battles in public and record them so that you
can disseminate the evidence for everyone to see. Always let women escalate the fight but if it
seems that the women can actually engage in a meaningful discourse, respond in kind. Otherwise make sure you expose that person’s fraudulent behavior.
The reason we are doing this is because we want
to penetrate the Hamster and target the woman’s Insecurities; that is the
reason the Hamster is running. Force the woman to confront her own
insecurities, make her feel ashamed of herself, make her cry, make her doubt
her own abilities, make her truly assess herself objectively and make her grow
up. Reward the woman if she succeeds in maturing and battle her again if she
regresses. Again this is not a one-time event; it is a long continuous campaign
so you really have to think about which fights you want to invest your time and
effort. Still practice makes perfect and at least in the beginning especially
using social media, you are going to need to engage in a lot of fights to learn
what to say and how to say it. This is only my experience so please take it with circumspect.
Lastly, I have to address on engaging the
Feminazis; DON’T. Not unless you have an elaborate sure winning strategy but
even then, you need to consider the cost and the outcome. Feminazis are fanatic
believers of Feminism; they have conviction in their beliefs and they won’t
change. What’s worse, there are Feminazis who are mature, working, rational,
sensible but are just discriminatory against men. Their Hamster is not your
normal Hamster, it’s a frankenhamster and I don’t have an answer on how to deal
with those I’m afraid. I’ll be sure to let you know if I come up with anything.
If anyone has anything more to add; such as
other strategies and tactics that they have seen or tried, I implore you to
share them with everyone. Thank you for reading.
Reference
